Eric, by Terry Pratchett

[part of my ongoing complete re-read of Discworld]

(for those who missed the announcement, I’ve skipped Guards! Guards! on the grounds of not being able to find the damn thing, though I’m sure it must be around here somewhere…)

To be honest, there’s not a great deal to say about Eric. At only a few hundred pages, it’s easily the shortest Discworld novel so far, and not much more than half the length of Pyramids. Divide that short length up in a very episodic fashion, and there’s not a lot of substance left. Eric was originally an illustrated novel, but my copy (like almost all the copies you’ll find these days) is minus its illustrations, leaving it just abnormally short (and something of an unwanted sibling in the family, its name often omitted or bracketed in early lists of Discworld novels).

It’s short, and… there’s nothing really essential in it either. It’s the first – and it remains the most in-depth – work dealing with the demons of the Disc, but nobody realy cares about them, so that doesn’t matter too much. It’s the first time we see the Tezumen first-hand, having had at least one teaser before… but it’s also the last time, so nobody cares about them either.

That said, it’s not a bad book. In fact, for a certain purpose, it could be quite a good book. It’s more polished than previous Rincewind novels, and the character has less scope to annoy thanks to the format and extent of the book. There are the normal literary and pop-culture references, but nothing too intellectual really. It’s pretty funny throughout, with a high rate of jocularity per inch, and a fair success rate on the humour too. And it’s short, light, and fits in small spaces. In short, if you’re a Discworld fan who’s going to be stuck in an airport for a couple of hours, you could do a lot worse than this one, which should provide you with an untaxing, enjoyable read that you can get out of the way before your business conference starts (or audience with the queen, dowsing seminar, whatever reason it is you have for travel, really). And since everyone always forgets it exists, you probably won’t remember all the jokes this time.

On the other hand, it’s a book that… well, if it turned out that this book didn’t exist but was just a dream I had, it would change pretty much nothing, even within the limited sub-world of Terry Pratchett fandom. It all has the feel of a throw-away lark; the worldbuilding is disposable, and the humour is adequate but rarely top-drawer, as though Pratchett were saving his best work for some time when it might actually count.

About the only thing that Eric establishes is that Rincewind is a very limited character, or at least a character of very limited utility. Pratchett wouldn’t return to his original protagonist for another eight novels (and four years); four years (and five novels) after that, it would be his (so-far) final starring appearance (although he does crop up as a peripheral character once more, 19 years after Eric). He’s a source of easy jokes, and his natural disengagement does make him a good external observer when Pratchett wants to take us out of ‘mainstream’ Discworld settings – I remember both Interesting Times and The Last Continent being relatively good installments, and I don’t think Pratchett has managed to find a replacement for him in this role (the witches had a go in Witches Abroad, and though I liked it I think those characters would get tiring as tourists even faster than Rincewind, especially because unlike him they can’t stop trying to intefere in things, and their second attempt, Carpe Jugulum, was much less succesful; the long-term replacement I think was meant to be Vimes, but although that worked in The Fifth Elephant it was much less succesful in Monstrous Regiment and Thud). For that reason, I wouldn’t be surprised if we see Rincewind again. But the substance of a Rincewind novel has to come from around Rincewind, not from within, and that’s a big handicap for the book – true, there were flashes of real character in both The Colour of Magic and Sourcery, but in the end what makes him a good observer (the fact he’d really rather be somewhere else not doing anything) is also what makes him a poor protagonist. To make him do anything, he has to be railroaded, and that can only work so many times before it becomes annoying. I didn’t find him annoying in Eric, but I did feel I had reached the annoyance threshold. It was time for Pratchett to move on; and, to his credit, he did.

So, scores:

Adrenaline: 2/5. A protagonist who’d rather be at home combined with a highly episodic plot does not make for excitement. Saved from the lowest score since the episodes themselves do work reasonably well.

Emotion: 2/5. Again, hard to really get emotionally involved, although the characters are vivid and… well, not likeable, but sympathetic.

Thought: 2/5. There’s the usual Pratchett wit and erudition, but it’s not firing on… oh I can’t be bothered to finish that cliché, but you know what I mean. The plot isn’t that clever, and there’s nothing really provocative here.

Beauty: 3/5. Pratchett’s prose remains suave and likeable, and there are some good scene descriptions… but nothing extraordinary.

Craft: 4/5. It may read like something he whipped up on a napkin because he was told he had to write a book in five minutes, but it’s really well made. Both the episodes and the book as a whole are neatly plotted, the prose is good, it’s (fairly) funny, and a cast of mostly new characters is introduced and sharply drawn. Even when Pratchett doesn’t write good books, he still writes them well.

Endearingness: 3/5. Fun, entertaining, a pleasant amuse-bouche. Nothing really loveable here, though – it hasn’t stood out strongly in my memory, and I don’t think it will in future, either.

Originality: 3/5. Obviously, many elements owe to many sources, but Pratchett’s adequately inventive in how he pieces things together.

Overall: 4/7. Not Bad. This is one of the worst Discworld books so far. But a bad Discworld book is still better than a lot of other books you could be reading, and this one at least won’t take very long to read. And even if it’s lightweight and kind of pointless, at least it’s amusing.

11 thoughts on “Eric, by Terry Pratchett

  1. Hans says:

    The Tezumen? I don’t remember those… are they worth re-reading the novel?

  2. No.
    The Tezumen are pseudo-Aztecs/Maya living in a remote part of Klatch. I don’t think they ever show up again, and they’re not given a huge amount of detail (they perform mass human sacrifices to the strangely-shaped dark god Quezovercoatl, and they have discovered every possible use for a round stone disc with a hole in the middle except for one…)
    They were previously mentioned in footnotes for their unusual calendrical system – unlike most calendars, the Tezumen calendar counts down. Nobody has ever dared asked what it’s counting down to, exactly…

  3. Nathan says:

    Eric has always been my ‘WTF am I going to read next’ book. Mostly for the reasons you stated. Short and simple.

  4. Yeah, I actually found I enjoyed it more than I was expecting to. It also really fit my reading opportunities at the time, since as well as being short it’s also easy to pop in and out of thanks to the episodic nature.

    I think sometimes I get jaded by Pratchett. I was both pleasantly surprised by this book (it was better than I remembered it being) and also somehow disappointed (because it wasn’t as good as Pratchett can be). But in the end, I try to remember that actually ‘not bad’ is… well, not a bad thing to be.

  5. […] Sisters Pyramids Guards! Guards! (to follow as soon as I actually find my copy of the damn thing) Eric Moving Pictures Reaper Man Witches Abroad Small Gods Lords and Ladies Men at Arms Soul Music […]

  6. Many thanks, btw, for that link on your own blog. Much appreciated.

    However, I’ve just put up a page,, to store all my Discworld reviews in one place, so could you change the link to point there, please? Thanks! [*cough* also, the name’s spelled with an ‘e’, not an ‘a’ *cough*]

  7. Hans says:

    Thanks for explaining the Tezumen – I remember the calendar thing now. And BTW, you’re spot on with Rincewind. What I also hate is that he doesn’t seem to develop as a character; e.g., after he seemed to “man up” a bit on Fourecks, he just returned to his usual pathetic self.

  8. Nathan: thanks!

    Hans: very true. I think he regresses after every novel. To be fair to him, though, I don’t know how much of it is that he’s a limited character because he doesn’t develop, and how much is that he isn’t allowed to develop because he’s a limited character? What I mean is, from Sourcery on, he only appears when Pratchett feels the need for a very specific type of character to fulfil a specific role – which means that if he does develop in one book, he has to be ‘reset’ in order to be able to fulfill that role again next time. So it’s sort of a vicious circle, I think: not an interesting character because he stays the same, so relegated to roles where he can’t change, so he stays the same, so he’s not an interesting character…

  9. =Tamar says:

    The Last Continent was almost the last Discworld-only novel Rincewind was in. After that he’s only in the Science of Discworld books, until The Last Hero, and all of them are ensemble stories. Besides, Rincewind does change. He started by trying to avoid adventures. Rincewind learned that he is fated to go on adventures whether he is willing or not, and finally (in The Last Hero) he clearly expressed that he knows it will happen, so he shows up without being dragged in but he still chooses to point out that he is not going willingly.

  10. Darn, I forgot about The Last Hero (probably because, like Eric, it’s been moved into the main Discworld sequence retrospectively).

    I’m also not going to be including the Science books in this project, though I guess I should have a go at reading them sometime, nor the various ancillary maps, diaries, etc, since although I like the ones I’ve seen, I’ve no idea how to review them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s